- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-71/15: Judgment of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — Jaguar Land Rover v EUIPO — Nissan Jidosha (Land Glider) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Land Glider — Earlier EU and national word and figurative marks LAND ROVER — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0071
62015TA0071
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.4.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 104/44
(Case T-71/15)(1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Land Glider - Earlier EU and national word and figurative marks LAND ROVER - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 104/62)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Jaguar Land Rover Ltd (Coventry, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Ingerl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Garrido Otaola, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nissan Jidosha KK (Yokohama, Japan) (A. Franke, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 December 2014 (Case R 1415/2013-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Jaguar Land Rover and Nissan Jidosha.
Operative part of the judgment
The General Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 December 2014 (Case R 1415/2013-4);
2.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Jaguar Land Rover Ltd;
3.Orders Nissan Jidosha KK to bear its own costs.
(1)
OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.
Language of the case: English
ECLI:EU:C:2017:140
* * *
(1) Language of the case: English.