I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2013/C 260/49)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Umbra Packaging srl
Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale di Perugia
1.Is Article 160 of Legislative Decree No 259/2003, which provides the basis for the government concession tax charged at the tariff indicated in Article 21 of [the Annex to] Presidential Decree No 641/1972, consistent with Article 3 of Directive 20/2002/EC, which, within the liberalised system for communications, prohibits administrative authorities from having the power of control which is used to justify the charge imposed on service users?
2.Is Article 3(2) of Ministerial Decree No 33/1990, which is referred to in the tariff indicated in Article 21 of [the Annex to] Presidential Decree No 641/1972, as amended by Article 3 of Legislative Decree No 151/1991, consistent with the system of free competition and the prohibition, laid down in Article 102 of the Treaty, of applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions?
3.Are the differing rates of the government concession tax imposed on domestic and business users and its being applied only to subscription agreements, not to pre-paid services, consistent with the criteria of reasonableness and appropriateness and do those differences not impede the creation of a competitive market?
Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) (OJ L 108, p. 21).
* * *