18.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/32

(Case T-623/17)

(2017/C 437/39)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Previsión Sanitaria Nacional, PSN, Mutua de Seguros y Reaseguros a Prima Fija (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. Ariño Sánchez, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

—Annul the contested act;

—In any event, order that the contract for the provision of services relating to the definitive valuation and the valuation referred to in Article 20(16) to (19) of Regulation No 806/2014 be awarded by means of a competitive selection procedure, in which the expert who carried out the provisional valuation of the Banco cannot participate, recognise the right to be heard of the parties adversely affected by the original act in the context of the ex post valuation, granting access to all the documents of the administrative procedure, and order that the applicant be awarded the maximum countervalue resulting from the ex post valuation and its payment by the Banco’s [Banco de Santander] contractor or, in the alternative, by SRB;

—Irrespective of the second head of claim, and incidentally to the first, order SRB to make a payment to PSN in the sum of EUR 276 201,42 together with statutory interest as of the date of this application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.