I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-194/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International figurative registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark HYALOSTEL ONE - Earlier EU word mark HYALISTIL and earlier figurative mark HyalOne - Earlier international word mark HYALO - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons)
(2022/C 95/45)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Fidia farmaceutici SpA (Abano Terme, Italy) (represented by: R. Kunz-Hallstein and H.P. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Sliwinska and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Stelis Biopharma Ltd (Karnataka, India)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 January 2021 (Case R 831/2020-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Fidia Farmaceutici and Stelis Biopharma.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 January 2021 (Case R 831/2020-5);
2.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Fidia farmaceutici SpA in connection with the present proceedings.
*
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.