- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-440/07, T-465/07 and T-1/08: Order of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — Huta Buczek and Others v Commission (No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TB0440(02)
62007TB0440(02)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.9.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 260/14
(Case T-440/07, T-465/07 and T-1/08) (<span class="super">1</span>)
2010/C 260/18
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicants: Huta Buczek Sp. z o.o. (Sosnowiec, Poland) (represented by: D. Szlachetko-Reiter, lawyer) (Case T-440/07); Emilian Salej, acting as liquidator of Technologie Buczek S.A. (Laryszów, Poland); Technologie Buczek S.A. (Sosnowiec) (represented by: D. Szlachetko-Reiter, lawyer) (Case T-465/07); and Buczek Automotive Sp z o.o. (Sosnowiec) (represented by: T. Gackowski initially, then D. Szlachetko-Reiter and finally J. Jurczyk, lawyers) (Case T-1/08)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Gross, M. Kaduczak, A. Stobiecka-Kuik and K. Herrmann, Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicants: Republic of Poland (represented by: M. Niechciał initially, then M. Krasnodebska-Tomkiel and M. Rzotkiewicz, Agents) (Cases T-440/07 and T-1/08).
Re:
Applications for partial annulment of the Commission Decision C(2007) 5087 final of 23 October 2007 in Case No C 23/2006 (ex NN 35/2006) concerning State aid granted by Poland to the steel producer Grupa Technologie Buczek
Operative part of the order
1.There is no further need to adjudicate on the application in Case T-465/07, as brought by Emilian Salej.
2.The parties are to bear their own costs relating to Case T-465/07, as brought by Emilian Salej.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.