- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-557/22: Action brought on 9 September 2022 — Chmielarz v EUIPO — Granulat (granulat)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0557
62022TN0557
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.10.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 418/50
(Case T-557/22)
(2022/C 418/64)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Arkadiusz Chmielarz (Olsztyn, Poland) (represented by: D. Sęczkowski, Advocate)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Granulat GmbH (Troisdorf, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark granulat — Application for registration No 18 066 758
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 June 2022 in Case R 1197/2021-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—annul the decision of the Opposition Division to the extent the opposition was upheld;
—order EUIPO to register the contested trade mark application;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.