- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-95/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Agenzia delle Dogane v Silcompa SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 76/308/EEC — Articles 6 and 8 and Article 12(1) to (3) — Mutual assistance for the recovery of certain claims — Excise duty payable in two Member States for the same transactions — Directive 92/12/EC — Articles 6 and 20 — Release of products for consumption — Falsification of the accompanying administrative document — Offence or irregularity committed in the course of movement of products subject to excise duty under a duty suspension arrangement — Irregular departure of products from a suspension arrangement — ‘Duplication of the tax claim’ relating to the excise duties — Review carried out by the courts of the Member State in which the requested authority is situated — Refusal of the request for assistance made by the competent authorities of another Member State — Conditions)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0095
62019CA0095
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/2
(Case C-95/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 76/308/EEC - Articles 6 and 8 and Article 12(1) to (3) - Mutual assistance for the recovery of certain claims - Excise duty payable in two Member States for the same transactions - Directive 92/12/EC - Articles 6 and 20 - Release of products for consumption - Falsification of the accompanying administrative document - Offence or irregularity committed in the course of movement of products subject to excise duty under a duty suspension arrangement - Irregular departure of products from a suspension arrangement - ‘Duplication of the tax claim’ relating to the excise duties - Review carried out by the courts of the Member State in which the requested authority is situated - Refusal of the request for assistance made by the competent authorities of another Member State - Conditions)
(2021/C 138/02)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Agenzia delle Dogane
Respondent: Silcompa SpA
Operative part of the judgment
Article 12(3) of Council Directive 76/308/EEC of 15 March 1976 on mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to certain levies, duties, taxes and other measures, as amended by Council Directive 2001/44/EC of 15 June 2001, read in conjunction with Article 20 of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products, as amended by Council Directive 92/108/EEC of 14 December must be interpreted as meaning that, in the context of an action disputing enforcement measures taken in the Member State in which the requested authority is situated, the competent body of that Member State may refuse to grant the request to recover excise duties submitted by the competent authority of another Member State in respect of goods which irregularly departed from a suspension arrangement, for the purposes of Article 6(1) of Directive 92/12, as amended by Directive 92/108, where that request is based on the facts relating to the same export transactions which are already subject to excise duty recovery in the Member State in which the requested authority is situated.
(*) Language of the case: Italian.