- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-89/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 21 October 2015 — Arsène v Commission (Civil Service — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Condition set out in Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Ten-year reference period — Starting point — Disregarding of periods of duty in the service of an international organisation — Application by analogy of the provisions of Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Usual residence outside the State of employment before performing duties in the service of an international organisation — Article 81 of the Staff Regulations — Action manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FB0089
62014FB0089
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.11.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 398/78
(Case F-89/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil Service - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Condition set out in Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Ten-year reference period - Starting point - Disregarding of periods of duty in the service of an international organisation - Application by analogy of the provisions of Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Usual residence outside the State of employment before performing duties in the service of an international organisation - Article 81 of the Staff Regulations - Action manifestly unfounded))
(2015/C 398/93)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Maria Lucia Arsène (Bucarest, Romania) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and T.S. Bohr, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision to refuse the applicant the expatriation allowance and for an order that it pay that allowance, together with interest, from the date of the applicant’s entry into service.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.
2.Ms Arsène shall bear her own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 421, 24.11.2014, p. 62.
* * *
(2015/C 398/93)
Language of the case: French