EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-684/23, Latvijas Sabiedriskais Autobuss: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 15 November 2023 — SIA Latvijas Sabiedriskais Autobuss v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs, VSIA Autotransporta direkcija

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0684

62023CN0684

November 15, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2024/938

29.1.2024

(Case C-684/23, Latvijas Sabiedriskais Autobuss)

(C/2024/938)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SIA Latvijas Sabiedriskais Autobuss

Defendants: Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs, VSIA Autotransporta direkcija

Questions referred

(1)Is Article 5 of Regulation No 1370/2007 to be interpreted as meaning that, in the course of the public tendering procedure referred to in paragraph 3 of that article, the requirements laid down in paragraph 2(c) of that article for the participation of an internal operator in the tendering procedure must be verified?

(2)If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, is Article 5(2)(c) of Regulation No 1370/2007 to be interpreted as meaning that the contracting authority, when it decides on the award of the contract, is required to verify whether all the requirements set out in that provision are met at the time of submission of the tender, while also taking into account circumstances arising after submission of the tender which may influence fair competition between the tenderers?

(3)If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, is Article 5(2)(c) of Regulation No 1370/2007 to be interpreted as meaning that the extension of the period for performance of a service contract that was concluded previously amounts to another directly awarded public service contract within the meaning of that provision?

Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ 2007 L 315, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/938/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: Latvian

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia