- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-65/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Pereira Sequeira v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Internal competition published before 1 May 2004 — Member of the temporary staff appearing on the list of suitable candidates before 1 May 2006 — Grading — Articles 5(4) and 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Secretarial allowance — Action in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006FA0065
62006FA0065
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.11.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 340/38
(Case F-65/06)(1)
(Staff case - Officials - Appointment - Internal competition published before 1 May 2004 - Member of the temporary staff appearing on the list of suitable candidates before 1 May 2006 - Grading - Articles 5(4) and 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Secretarial allowance - Action in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)
2011/C 340/76
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Rosa Maria Pereira Sequeira (Brussels, Belgium) (represented, initially, by T. Bontinck and J. Feld, lawyers, and subsequently by T. Bontinck and S. Woog, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by J. Currall and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)
Re:
Annulment of the decision of the Appointing Authority, notified to the applicant on 19 September 2005, whereby the latter, a member of the temporary staff and a successful candidate in internal competition COM/PC//04, was appointed an official in Grade C*1, pursuant to the provisions of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations.
Operative part of the judgment
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.
(1)
OJ C 165 of 15.07.06, p. 36.