- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-259/23, Synlabhealth II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Concorrência, Regulação e Supervisão (Portugal) lodged on 24 April 2023 — Synlabhealth II SA v Autoridade da Concorrência
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0259
62023CN0259
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.8.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 304/3
(Case C-259/23, Synlabhealth II)
(2023/C 304/05)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Synlabhealth II SA
Defendant: Autoridade da Concorrência
Questions referred
I.Do the business records at issue in this case, which are transmitted by e-mail, constitute ‘correspondence’ for the purposes of Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?
II.Does Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union preclude business records arising from e-mail communications between managers and employees of undertakings from being seized in the course of an investigation into agreements and practices prohibited under Article 101 TFEU (ex Article 81 TEC)?
III.Does Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union preclude such business records from being seized on the prior authorisation of a judicial authority, in this case the Public Prosecutor’s Office, which is responsible for representing the State, defending the interests determined by law, bringing criminal prosecutions on the basis of the principle of legality and defending democratic legality in accordance with the Constitution, and which operates independently of the other central, regional and local authorities?