- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-134/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 March 2015 — Lidl Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. KG v Freistaat Sachsen
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CN0134
62015CN0134
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.6.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 205/15
(Case C-134/15)
(2015/C 205/20)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Lidl Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co. KG
Respondent: Freistaat Sachsen
Questions referred
1.Is Article 5(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 (1) compatible with the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), in conjunction with Articles 15(1) and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?
2.Is Article 5(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 compatible with the second subparagraph of Article 40(2) TFEU?
Commission Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 of 16 June 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards the marketing standards for poultrymeat (OJ 2008 L 157, p. 46).