I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
16.9.2024
(EU trade mark – Appointment of a new representative – Applicant having ceased to respond to requests from the General Court – Article 131(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/5416)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Synapsa Med sp. z o.o. (Jelcz-Laskowice, Poland) (represented by: G. Kuchta, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Gravity Brand Holdings LLC (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: V. Balaguer Fuentes, I. Sempere Massa and J. Schmitt, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 January 2023 (Case R 923/2022-5).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Synapsa Med sp. z o.o. to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by Gravity Brand Holdings LLC.
—
*
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5416/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 173, 15.5.2023.
—
* * *