- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-664/16: Action brought on 14 September 2016 — PJ v EUIPO — Erdmann & Rossi (Erdmann & Rossi)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0664
62016TN0664
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 70/22
(Case T-664/16)
(2017/C 070/31)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: PJ (represented by: B. Schürmann, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (Berlin, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the mark at issue: Applicant
Mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Erdmann & Rossi’ — EU trade mark No 10 310 481
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2016 in Case R 1670/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and the invalidity proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the Cancellation Division.
Pleas in law
—infringement of Articles 52, 56, 63, 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009
—infringement of Rules 50, 55 and 94 of Regulation No 2868/95;
—infringement of Article 12 of Regulation No 216/96;
—infringement of Article 6 ECHR;
—infringement of Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.