- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-101/17: Order of the General Court of 27 July 2018 — Apple Distribution International v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Aid planned by Germany to fund film production and distribution — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TB0101
62017TB0101
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.10.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 381/25
(Case T-101/17) (*)
((Action for annulment - State aid - Aid planned by Germany to fund film production and distribution - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - No individual concern - Inadmissibility))
(2018/C 381/29)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Apple Distribution International (Cork, Ireland) (represented by: S. Schwiddessen, H. Lutz, N. Niejahr and A. Patsa, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Samnadda, G. Braun and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2042 of 1 September 2016 on the aid scheme SA.38418 — 2014/C (ex 2014/N) which Germany is planning to implement for the funding of film production and distribution (OJ 2016 L 314, p. 63).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no need to rule on the applications to intervene lodged by the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic and the Filmförderungsanstalt.
3.Apple Distribution International shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the applications to intervene.
4.Apple Distribution International, the Commission, the Federal Republic of Germany, the French Republic and the Filmförderungsanstalt shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.
(*) Language of the case: English.
* * *
(1) OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.