EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-484/20: Action brought on 3 August 2020 — SATSE v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0484

62020TN0484

August 3, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/25

(Case T-484/20)

(2020/C 304/29)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Sindicato de Enfermería (SATSE) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Sesmero González, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

Annul Commission Directive (EU) 2020/739 of 3 June 2020 amending Annex III to Directive 2000/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the inclusion of SARS-CoV-2 in the list of biological agents known to infect humans and amending Commission Directive (EU) 2019/1833, published in the Official Journal of the European Union of 4 June 2020 (OJ 2020 L 175, p. 11).

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 2 and 18 of Directive 2000/54/EC and Annex III thereto.

In that regard, the applicant relies on the absence of any effective treatment or prophylaxis for the biological agent SARS-CoV-2, the fact that it is a virus that is considered to be highly contagious and which mutates and, therefore, is highly likely to spread to the community and the fact that the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 causes serious conditions and symptoms resulting in severe human disease, presenting a serious hazard to workers.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements on account of the failure to state reasons for the classification of the biological agent SARS-CoV-2 in group 3.

In that regard, the applicant submits that although the Commission acknowledged that there was no vaccine or effective treatment and despite what was provided for in Article 2 of Directive 2000/54/EC, it classified SARS-CoV-2 in risk group 3 rather than in risk group 4.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia