- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-470/14: Action brought on 24 June 2014 — Hewlett Packard Development Company v. OHIM (ELITEPAD)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0470
62014TN0470
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 292/50
(Case T-470/14)
2014/C 292/62
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hewlett Packard Development Company LP (Houston, United States) (represented by: T. Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 March 2014 in Case R 884/2013-2;
—Award the costs of the proceedings against the defendant.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ELITEPAD’ for goods in Class 9 Community trade mark application No 1 1 3 18 284
Decision of the Examiner: The application was refused
Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was rejected
Pleas in law: Violation of Art. 7 (1) (c) and Art. 7 (2) of Regulation No 207/2009.