EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-791/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2022 — Sped-Pro v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Rail freight transport services market — Decision rejecting a complaint — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 — Reasonable time — EU interest in pursuing examination of a complaint — Determination of the authority best placed to examine a complaint — Criteria — Manifest error of assessment — Systemic or generalised deficiencies concerning respect for the rule of law — Risk of infringement of a complainant’s rights if a complaint is rejected — Obligation to state reasons)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0791

62019TA0791

February 9, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/23

(Case T-791/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Rail freight transport services market - Decision rejecting a complaint - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 - Reasonable time - EU interest in pursuing examination of a complaint - Determination of the authority best placed to examine a complaint - Criteria - Manifest error of assessment - Systemic or generalised deficiencies concerning respect for the rule of law - Risk of infringement of a complainant’s rights if a complaint is rejected - Obligation to state reasons)

(2022/C 148/30)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Sped-Pro S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Kozak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Szczodrowski, L. Wildpanner and P. van Nuffel, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 6099 final of 12 August 2019 (Case AT.40459 — Rail freight forwarding in Poland — PKP Cargo), rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant concerning alleged infringements of Article 102 TFEU on the rail freight transport services market in Poland.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls Commission Decision C(2019) 6099 final of 12 August 2019 (Case AT.40459 — Rail freight forwarding in Poland — PKP Cargo);

2.Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Sped-Pro S.A;

3.Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia