I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-791/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Rail freight transport services market - Decision rejecting a complaint - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 - Reasonable time - EU interest in pursuing examination of a complaint - Determination of the authority best placed to examine a complaint - Criteria - Manifest error of assessment - Systemic or generalised deficiencies concerning respect for the rule of law - Risk of infringement of a complainant’s rights if a complaint is rejected - Obligation to state reasons)
(2022/C 148/30)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: Sped-Pro S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Kozak, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Szczodrowski, L. Wildpanner and P. van Nuffel, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 6099 final of 12 August 2019 (Case AT.40459 — Rail freight forwarding in Poland — PKP Cargo), rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant concerning alleged infringements of Article 102 TFEU on the rail freight transport services market in Poland.
The Court:
1.Annuls Commission Decision C(2019) 6099 final of 12 August 2019 (Case AT.40459 — Rail freight forwarding in Poland — PKP Cargo);
2.Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Sped-Pro S.A;
3.Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.