I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 182/41)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Knaus Tabbert GmbH (Jandelsbrunn, Germany) (represented by: N. Maenz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Carado GmbH (Leutkirch im Allgäu, Germany)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark CaraTour — Application for registration No 15 366 313
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 January 2019 in Case R 506/2018-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—reject Carado GmbH’s opposition of 27 July 2016 regarding EU trade mark No 4 935 334 and German trade mark No 30 611 776 (Case B 2 742 784) in its entirety;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.