- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-482/14: Action brought on 30 October 2014 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0482
62014CN0482
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.1.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 16/17
(Case C-482/14)
(2015/C 016/27)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls, J. Hottiaux and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should decide as follows:
By allowing public funds paid for the management of railway infrastructure to be transferred to transport services, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6(1) of Directive 2012/34/EU (Article 6(1) of Directive 91/440/EEC).
By failing to ensure that compliance with the prohibition on transferring public funds for the management of railway infrastructure to transport services can be monitored by the type of accounting system, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6(4) of Directive 2012/34/EU (Article 6(1) of Directive 91/440/EEC).
By failing to ensure that infrastructure charges can be used only to fund the infrastructure manager’s business, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 31(1) of Directive 2012/34/EU (Article 7(1) of Directive 2001/14/EC).
By failing to ensure that public funds paid for the provision of public passenger transport services are shown separately in the relevant accounts, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6(3) of Directive 2012/34/EU (Article 9(4) of Directive 91/440/EEC) and under Article 6(1) in conjunction with point 5 of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 (Article 6(1) of Directive 91/440/EEC).
The Federal Republic of Germany shall pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The applicant relies on the following in support of its action:
Germany allows the Deutsche Bahn group, by means of profit transfer agreements, to use railway infrastructure managers’ revenues in the form of infrastructure charges and public funds for purposes other than the management of infrastructure. Those funds could, in particular, be used for the purposes of transport services. That is contrary to Articles 6(1) and 31(1) of Directive 2012/34/EU.
In addition, the infrastructure managers’ accounting system does not allow the prohibition on transferring public funds to transport services to be monitored. Germany allows that, which is contrary to Article 6(4) of Directive 2012/34/EU.
Lastly, Germany does not ensure that public funds paid for the provision of public passenger transport services are shown separately in the relevant accounts. That is contrary to Article 6(3) of Directive 2012/34/EU and to Article 6(1) in conjunction with point 5 of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007.
(1) Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area, OJ 2012 L 343, p. 32.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70, OJ 2007 L 315, p. 1.