- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-25/19: Judgment of the General Court of 11 November 2020 — AD v ECHA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contracts — Decision not to renew — Duty of care — Equal treatment — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Right to be heard — Duty to state reasons — Liability)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0025
62019TA0025
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 9/14
(Case T-25/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Fixed-term contracts - Decision not to renew - Duty of care - Equal treatment - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Right to be heard - Duty to state reasons - Liability)
(2021/C 9/20)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: AD (represented by: N. Flandin and L. Levi, lawyers)
Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: C.-M. Bergerat and T. Zbihlej, acting as Agents, and by A. Duron, lawyer)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking (i) annulment, in substance, first, of ECHA’s decision of 28 March 2018 not to renew the applicant’s fixed-term contract and, second, of the vacancy notice for the establishment of a reserve list for the recruitment of contract staff for function group II published on 9 March 2018 and (ii) compensation for the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the decision of 28 March 2018 and the vacancy notice of 9 March 2018.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders AD to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.