- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-304/23: Action brought on 31 May 2023 — Coinbase v EUIPO (C)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0304
62023TN0304
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.7.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/79
(Case T-304/23)
(2023/C 252/95)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Coinbase, Inc. (Oakland, California, United-States) (represented by: M. Zintler, N. Schmidt-Hamkens and F. Stoll, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPOs
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark C — Application for registration No 1 629 156
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 March 2023 in Case R 2001/2022-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare that Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council does not preclude the registration of the trade mark at issue in respect of the claimed goods and services;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the principles of equal treatment and sound administration.