- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-414/09: Order of the General Court of 4 March 2010 — Henkel v OHIM — JLO Holding (LIVE) (Community trade marks — Application for revocation — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TB0414
62009TB0414
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 113/46
(Case T-414/09)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade marks - Application for revocation - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)
2010/C 113/75
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: C. Milbradt, subsequently by C. Milbradt and H. Van Volxem, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: JLO Holding Company LLC (Santa Monica, United States) (represented by: A. Klett, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 July 2009 (Case R 609/2008-1) relating to an application for revocation involving Henkel AG & Co. KGaA and JLO Holding Company, LLC.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The parties shall each bear their own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.
Language of the case: German.