I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-465/15) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017374EN.01000301-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017374EN.01000301-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Taxation of energy products and electricity - Directive 2003/96/EC - Scope - Article 2(4)(b) - Electricity used principally for the purposes of chemical reduction - Concept))
(2017/C 374/04)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Hüttenwerke Krupp Mannesmann GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Duisburg
The third indent of Article 2(4)(b) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity must be interpreted as meaning that the electricity used for the operation of turbo blowers intended to compress the air subsequently used in a blast furnace in the process of producing pig iron by chemical reduction of iron ore is not ‘electricity used principally for the purposes of chemical reduction’ within the meaning of that provision.
Language of the case: German.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) <a href="./../../../../legal-content/EN/AUTO/?uri=OJ:C:2015:398:TOC">OJ C 398, 30.11.2015</a>.