- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-132/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Roland v Commission (Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 — Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitive collection of the provisional duty — Resumption of the proceeding which preceded the regulations declared invalid — Market economy treatment (MET) — Individual treatment (IT) — Desk analysis — Absence of a verification visit or a request for additional information — Non-reimbursement of anti-dumping duties — Legal basis — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Non-retroactivity — Proportionality — Non-discrimination — Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Previous decision-making practice — Competence of national authorities and courts)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0132
62018TA0132
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.7.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 297/30
(Case T-132/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Dumping - Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam - Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 - Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitive collection of the provisional duty - Resumption of the proceeding which preceded the regulations declared invalid - Market economy treatment (MET) - Individual treatment (IT) - Desk analysis - Absence of a verification visit or a request for additional information - Non-reimbursement of anti-dumping duties - Legal basis - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Non-retroactivity - Proportionality - Non-discrimination - Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Previous decision-making practice - Competence of national authorities and courts)
(2021/C 297/35)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Roland SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: S. De Knop, A. Willems and B. Natens, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2232 of 4 December 2017 reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam and produced by certain exporting producers in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 (OJ 2017 L 319, p. 30).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Roland SE to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
* * *
Language of the case: English.