- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-46/24: Action brought on 29 January 2024 — Coinbase v EUIPO — bitFlyer (coinbase)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0046
62024TN0046
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/2053
18.3.2024
(Case T-46/24)
(C/2024/2053)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Coinbase, Inc. (Oakland, California, United States) (represented by: M. Maier and A. Nordemann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: bitFlyer Inc. (Tokyo, Japan)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark coinbase — International registration designating the European Union No 1 308 248
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 November 2023 in Case R 1751/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings.
Plea in law
Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2053/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)