EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-42/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023 — Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission, Orlen Lietuva AB (Appeal — Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Rail freight market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU — Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company — Removal of a section of railway track — Concept of ‘abuse’ — Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor — Exercise by the General Court of its powers of unlimited jurisdiction — Reduction of the fine)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0042

62021CA0042

January 12, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

27.2.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/4

(Case C-42/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Rail freight market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU - Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company - Removal of a section of railway track - Concept of ‘abuse’ - Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor - Exercise by the General Court of its powers of unlimited jurisdiction - Reduction of the fine)

(2023/C 71/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB (represented by: K. Apel, W. Deselaers and P. Kirst, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, A. Dawes, H. Leupold and G. Meessen, acting as Agents), Orlen Lietuva AB (represented by: C. Conte, avvocato, and C. Thomas, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and by Orlen Lietuva AB.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia