I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-42/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Rail freight market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU - Access by third-party undertakings to infrastructure managed by Lithuania’s national railway company - Removal of a section of railway track - Concept of ‘abuse’ - Actual or likely exclusion of a competitor - Exercise by the General Court of its powers of unlimited jurisdiction - Reduction of the fine)
(2023/C 71/04)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB (represented by: K. Apel, W. Deselaers and P. Kirst, Rechtsanwälte)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, A. Dawes, H. Leupold and G. Meessen, acting as Agents), Orlen Lietuva AB (represented by: C. Conte, avvocato, and C. Thomas, avocat)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and by Orlen Lietuva AB.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.