- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-493/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — Ireland) — Criminal proceedings against K.M. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 — Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy — Article 89 — Measures to ensure compliance — Article 90 — Criminal sanctions — Principle of proportionality — Interpretation of the judgment of 11 February 2021, K. M. (Sanctions imposed on the master of a vessel) (C-77/20, EU:C:2021:112))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CB0493
62021CB0493
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 222/5
(Case C-493/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Common fisheries policy - Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 - Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy - Article 89 - Measures to ensure compliance - Article 90 - Criminal sanctions - Principle of proportionality - Interpretation of the judgment of 11 February 2021, K. M. (Sanctions imposed on the master of a vessel) (C-77/20, EU:C:2021:112))
(2022/C 222/07)
Language of the case: English
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: K.M.
Other party: Director of Public Prosecutions
Operative part of the order
Articles 89 and 90 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006, read in the light of the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as meaning that it is for the national courts to assess, in accordance with the assessment criteria provided by the Court in the judgment of 11 February 2021, K. M. (Sanctions imposed on the master of a vessel) (C-77/20, EU:C:2021:112), whether, in relation to the infringement committed, including its seriousness, the mandatory forfeiture of all catch and all fishing gear found on board the vessel concerned is proportionate to the attainment of the objective legitimately pursued by the prohibition, laid down in Article 32(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 of 30 March 1998 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 227/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2013, relating to grading equipment, and to examine, if necessary, the need to adjust, modulate or mitigate the extent of the forfeiture order in respect of the catch and the fishing gear.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140