I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-508/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Interpretation sought by the referring court necessary to enable it to give judgment - Concept - Disciplinary proceedings brought against a judge of an ordinary court - Designation of the disciplinary court having jurisdiction to hear those proceedings by the President of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) - Civil action for a declaration that a service relationship does not exist between the President of that disciplinary chamber and the Supreme Court - Lack of jurisdiction of the referring court to review the validity of the appointment of a Supreme Court judge and inadmissibility of such an action under national law - Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
(2022/C 198/03)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: M.F.
Defendant: J.M.
Intervening party: Prokurator Generalny, Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych) (Supreme Court (Labour and Social Insurance Chamber), Poland) is inadmissible.
(*) Language of the case: Polish.