I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2024/2636)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Kokito I Punt, SL (Gandía, Spain) (represented by: J. Gallego Jiménez, E. Sanz Valls, P. Bauzá Martínez and Y. Hernández Viñes, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fédération française de football (Paris, France)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for a European Union figurative mark (Representation of a rooster) – Application for registration No 18 469 266
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 December 2023 in Case R 901/2023-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener, if any, to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2636/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—