- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-654/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 July 2019 — Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v European Commission, Freistaat Sachsen (Appeal — State aid — Regional investment aid — Aid for a large investment project — Aid partly incompatible with the internal market — Article 107(3) TFEU — Whether the aid is necessary — Article 108(3) TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 — Aid exceeding the individual notification threshold — Notification — Scope of the block exemption — Cross-appeal — Whether an intervention before the General Court of the European Union may proceed — Admissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CA0654
62017CA0654
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.9.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 319/11
(Case C-654/17 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - State aid - Regional investment aid - Aid for a large investment project - Aid partly incompatible with the internal market - Article 107(3) TFEU - Whether the aid is necessary - Article 108(3) TFEU - Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 - Aid exceeding the individual notification threshold - Notification - Scope of the block exemption - Cross-appeal - Whether an intervention before the General Court of the European Union may proceed - Admissibility)
(2019/C 319/10)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (represented by: M. Rosenthal, G. Drauz and M. Schütte, Rechtsanwälte)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher, A. Bouchagiar and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents), Freistaat Sachsen (represented by: T. Lübbig, Rechtsanwalt)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal;
2.Orders Bayerische Motoren Werke AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in respect of the main appeal;
3.Orders Freistaat Sachsen to bear its own costs in respect of the main appeal;
4.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and of Freistaat Sachsen in respect of the cross-appeal.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.