EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-52/22, BVAEB (Adjustment of retirement pensions): Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Austria) — BF v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Directive 2000/78/EC — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — Article 2(1) and (2)(a) — Article 6(1) — Retirement pension — National legislation providing for a gradual alignment of the pension scheme for civil servants with the general pension scheme — First adjustment of the amount of the pension being made more quickly for one category of civil servants than for another — Justification)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0052

62022CA0052

April 20, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

12.6.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/12

(Case C-52/22, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) BVAEB (Adjustment of retirement pensions))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Directive 2000/78/EC - Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age - Article 2(1) and (2)(a) - Article 6(1) - Retirement pension - National legislation providing for a gradual alignment of the pension scheme for civil servants with the general pension scheme - First adjustment of the amount of the pension being made more quickly for one category of civil servants than for another - Justification)

(2023/C 205/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: BF

Defendant: Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1) and (2)(a) and (b) and Article 6(1) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation

must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, with a view to gradually aligning the pension scheme for civil servants with the general pension scheme, provides that the first adjustment of the amount of the retirement pension of one category of civil servants is to be made as from the second calendar year following the commencement of entitlement to a pension, whereas, for another category of civil servants, that adjustment is to be made from the first calendar year following the commencement of that entitlement.

Language of the case: German.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia