- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-44/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 May 2017 — Dyson Ltd v Commission (Appeal — Directive 2010/30/EU — Indication of energy consumption by labelling and standard product information — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 — Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners — Energy efficiency — Measurement method — Limits of delegated powers — Distortion of the evidence — Duty of the General Court to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CA0044
62016CA0044
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.7.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 239/10
(Case C-44/16 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Appeal - Directive 2010/30/EU - Indication of energy consumption by labelling and standard product information - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 - Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners - Energy efficiency - Measurement method - Limits of delegated powers - Distortion of the evidence - Duty of the General Court to state reasons))
(2017/C 239/13)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Dyson Ltd (represented by: E. Batchelor and M. Healy, Solicitors, F. Carlin, Barrister, and A. Patsa, Advocate)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and E. White, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 11 November 2015, Dyson v Commission (T-544/13, EU:T:2015:836), in so far as it rejected the first part of the first plea in law and the third plea in law put forward at first instance;
2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for it to give judgment on the first part of the first plea in law and the third plea in law put forward at first instance;
3.Reserves the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.