- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-660/23, Intervlees: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) lodged on 9 November 2023 — Intervlees NV v Sump & Stammer GmbH
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0660
62023CN0660
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/1240
12.2.2024
(Case C-660/23, Intervlees)
(C/2024/1240)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Intervlees NV
Defendant: Sump & Stammer GmbH
Question referred
Must the provisions of Annex III, Section I, Chapter VII, point 4, to Regulation No 853/2004 (1) be interpreted as meaning that the stabilisation period relates only to the short period after slaughter during which the meat is chilled in order to achieve the required pH and thermal stabilisation, such that meat intended for freezing must be frozen immediately thereafter, and that it therefore does not relate to the subsequent chilling period for allowing the meat to mature further, such that meat intended for freezing can no longer be frozen after maturation?
(1) Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption (OJ 2004 L 139, p. 55).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1240/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)