- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-231/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2019 — Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO — Lupu (Djili) [EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Djili — Earlier national word mark GILLY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001]
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0231
62018TA0231
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 122/18
(Case T-231/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Djili - Earlier national word mark GILLY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2019/C 122/21)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam (Dulovo, Bulgaria) (represented by C.-R. Romițan, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by D. Gája and D. Walicka, and subsequently by D. Gája and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Victor Lupu (Bucharest, Romania)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 January 2018 (Case R 1902/2017-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Lupu and Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019122EN.01001802-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019122EN.01001802-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 200, 11.6.2018.