- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-29/24: Action brought on 17 January 2024 — Kaili v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0029
62024TN0029
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/1561
26.2.2024
(Case T-29/24)
(C/2024/1561)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Eva Kaili (Ixelles, Belgium) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of 7 November 2023 of the Director of the Directorate for Members’ Financial and Social Entitlements, Directorate-General for Finance of the European Parliament, ordering the recovery of part of the applicant’s general expenditure allowance and
—Order the defendant to bear its costs as well as the Applicant’s costs for the current proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the Director of the Directorate for Members’ Financial and Social Entitlements, Directorate-General for Finance of the European Parliament was not competent to adopt the contested decision since Article 68 of implementing measures for the statute for members of the European Parliament (IMMS) grants such competence to the Secretary-General of the European Parliament.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that Article 43 IMMS was erroneously applied in her case, since her detention constitutes a situation of force majeure.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1561/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)