- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-386/20: Action brought on 16 June 2020 — Micron Technology v EUIPO (INTELLIGENCE, ACCELERATED)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0386
62020TN0386
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.8.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 271/45
(Case T-386/20)
(2020/C 271/57)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Micron Technology, Inc. (Boise, Idaho, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark INTELLIGENCE, ACCELERATED — Application for registration No 17 959 758
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 April 2020 in Case R 2873/2019-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—alternatively, alter the contested decision such that it is now held that European Union trade mark application does not offend against Articles 7(1)(b) or (c) or both;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs to the applicant, the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this application.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Articles 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.