- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-271/21: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Ortis v Commission (Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under scrutiny of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First and second entries in Article 1(1), and first and second entries in Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Definition of substance, ingredient and preparations – Error of law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0271
62021TA0271
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/159
(Case T-271/21)
(Consumer protection - Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny - Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 - Prohibition and placing under scrutiny of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives - First and second entries in Article 1(1), and first and second entries in Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 - Definition of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ - Error of law)
(C/2025/159)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Ortis (Bütgenbach, Belgium) (represented by: A. de Brosses, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, I. Galindo Martín and B. Rous Demiri, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/468 of 18 March 2021 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards botanical species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives (OJ 2021 L 96, p. 6), in so far as, by the first and second entries in Article 1(1) of that regulation and the first and second entries in Article 1(2) thereof, the European Commission included certain hydroxyanthracene derivatives and certain preparations in Parts A and C of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods (OJ 2006 L 404, p. 26).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the first and second entries in Article 1(1), and the first and second entries in Article 1(2), of Commission Regulation (EU) No 2021/1468 of 18 March 2021 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards botanical species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives;
2.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.
*
Language of the case: French.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/159/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—