- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-394/24: Action brought on 30 July 2024 – Škor v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0394
62024TN0394
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/6441
(Case T-394/24)
(C/2024/6441)
Language of the case: Slovak
Parties
Applicant: Ján Škor (Nesluša, Slovakia) (represented by: L. Vojčík, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—order the defendant, representing the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 7 000 000 by way of compensation for non-material damage;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that during the investigation, OLAF incorrectly assessed the evidence, with the result that it wrongly decided to close the investigation into the project ‘Drinking water supply and connection to the sewage system in Horné Kysuce’ (Project No CCI 2004 SK 16 C PE 001), without opposing the adoption of the measure.
2.Second plea in law, alleging the manifest failure to state reasons for the notice of closure of the enquiry and the uncontrollable nature of that notice.
3.Third plea in law, alleging inaction by OLAF after the second complaint was lodged on 8 June 2018 and failure to open a new investigation.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6441/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—