- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-465/17: Order of the General Court of 18 May 2018 — VKR Holding v EUIPO (VELUX) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark VELUX — Claiming the seniority of the earlier national word mark VELUX — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TB0465
62017TB0465
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-465/17) (*1)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: VKR Holding A/S (Søborg, Denmark) (represented by: J. Heebøll, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 May 2017 (Case R 1927/2016-2) relating to an application claiming seniority of the identical national (Estonian) trade mark for the word mark VELUX, registered as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.
*
(1) OJ C 309, 18.9.2017.