- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-87/21: Action brought on 12 February 2021 — Condor Flugdienst v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0087
62021TN0087
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.3.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 110/37
(Case T-87/21)
(2021/C 110/42)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH (Kelsterbach, Germany) (represented by: A. Israel, J. Lang and M. Negro, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and
—order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed its obligation to initiate the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant committed a manifest error of assessment by holding that the aid to Lufthansa is compatible with the internal market under Article 107(3) (b) TFEU.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed to fulfil its duty to state reasons.