- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-826/17: Action brought on 22 December 2017 — TeamBank v EUIPO — Fio Systems (FYYO)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0826
62017TN0826
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.2.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 52/42
(Case T-826/17)
(2018/C 052/56)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: TeamBank AG Nürnberg (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: D. Terheggen and H. Lindner, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fio Systems AG (Leipzig, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘FYYO’ — Application No 14 589 261
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2017 in Case R 2337/2016-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2017 in appeal proceedings R 2337/2016-4 in so far as it rejected the trade mark application in respect of the goods in Class 9;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.