EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-42/24, Emporiki Serron – Emporias kai Diathesis Agrotikon Proionton: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias – Greece) – Emporiki Serron AE – Emporias kai Diathesis Agrotikon Proionton v Ypourgos Anaptyxis kai Ependyseon, Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Irregularities – Article 3 – Limitation period – Duration and starting point of that period – National legislation providing for a five-year limitation period as from the time the irregularity is discovered)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CA0042

62024CA0042

February 6, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/1734

31.3.2025

(Case C-42/24,

(1)

Emporiki Serron – Emporias kai Diathesis Agrotikon Proionton)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 - Irregularities - Article 3 - Limitation period - Duration and starting point of that period - National legislation providing for a five-year limitation period as from the time the irregularity is discovered)

(C/2025/1734)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Emporiki Serron AE – Emporias kai Diathesis Agrotikon Proionton

Respondents: Ypourgos Anaptyxis kai Ependyseon, Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests, read in the light of the principle of legal certainty,

must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which sets a longer limitation period than that provided for in Article 3(1) of Regulation No 2988/95, subject to observing the principle of proportionality. In contrast, those provisions preclude national legislation which provides that that limitation period runs as from the date on which the national authorities discovered an irregularity with regard to the provisions of that regulation.

The fourth subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Regulation No 2988/95

must be interpreted as meaning that where a Member State has made use of the possibility offered by Article 3(3) of that regulation to provide for a longer limitation period than the four-year limitation period provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of that regulation, the absolute limitation period set in the fourth subparagraph of Article 3(1) of that regulation must be calculated by reference to that longer limitation period.

(1) OJ C C/2024/3052.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1734/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia