I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 - Irregularities - Article 3 - Limitation period - Duration and starting point of that period - National legislation providing for a five-year limitation period as from the time the irregularity is discovered)
(C/2025/1734)
Language of the case: Greek
Appellant: Emporiki Serron AE – Emporias kai Diathesis Agrotikon Proionton
Respondents: Ypourgos Anaptyxis kai Ependyseon, Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon
Article 3(1) and (3) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests, read in the light of the principle of legal certainty,
must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which sets a longer limitation period than that provided for in Article 3(1) of Regulation No 2988/95, subject to observing the principle of proportionality. In contrast, those provisions preclude national legislation which provides that that limitation period runs as from the date on which the national authorities discovered an irregularity with regard to the provisions of that regulation.
The fourth subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Regulation No 2988/95
must be interpreted as meaning that where a Member State has made use of the possibility offered by Article 3(3) of that regulation to provide for a longer limitation period than the four-year limitation period provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of that regulation, the absolute limitation period set in the fourth subparagraph of Article 3(1) of that regulation must be calculated by reference to that longer limitation period.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/3052.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1734/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—