I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-203/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 340/57)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: IN.PRO.DI — Inghirami produzione distribuzione SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: V. Piccarreta, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Antonino Aiello (Naples, Italy) (represented by: L. Manna, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 February 2021 (Case R 49/2020-1).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: Italian.
* * *
(1) OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.