EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-563/22: Action brought on 2 September 2022 — VP v Cedefop

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0563

62022TN0563

September 2, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

7.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/42

(Case T-563/22)

(2022/C 424/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the defendant’s decision of 17 December 2021 not to implement sections (1) and (2) of the operational part of the judgment of the GCEU, of 16 December 2020, in case T-187/18, VP v Cedefop;

annul the connected decision not to renew the applicant’s employment contract for an indefinite period with effect from 16 November 2017;

annul the decision of 17 June 2022 of the defendant rejecting the complaint of the applicant of 3 March 2022 against the decision of 17 December 2021;

order the compensation of the moral prejudice suffered by the applicant evaluated ex aequo et bono to one hundred thousand Euros;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the defendant’s decision not to implement the core sections (1) and (2) of the judgment of 16 December 2020 in case T-187/18, VP v Cedefop and, consequently, not to renew the employment contract of the applicant is vitiated by a breach of the obligation pursuant to Article 266 TFEU to comply with the Judgment in Case T-187/18 of 16 December 2020 and a manifest error of assessment.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed its obligation to duty of care.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed the principles of equal treatment and protection of legitimate expectations.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the defendant misused its power.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia