EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-464/21: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2022 — Faller and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Medicinal products for human use — Variation of the conditional marketing authorisation for the Comirnaty medicinal product for human use — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — No direct concern — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0464

62021TB0464

February 7, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/26

(Case T-464/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Variation of the conditional marketing authorisation for the Comirnaty medicinal product for human use - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - No direct concern - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 148/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Sonja Faller (Bressanone, Italy) and the 74 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: R. Holzeisen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 4034 (final) of 31 May 2021, amending the conditional marketing authorisation granted by Implementing Decision C(2020) 9598 (final) for Comirnaty — COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified), a medicinal product for human use.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.There is no longer a need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, by YI and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, by EW and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, and by Mr Arnošt Komárek and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II.

3.Ms Sonja Faller and the other applicants whose names are set out in Annex I are ordered to pay the costs.

4.TR and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, YI and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, EW and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II, and Mr Komárek and the other persons whose names are set out in Annex II shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia