I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2010/C 113/83
Language in which the application was lodged: Hungarian
Applicant(s): Intermark Srl (Stei, Romania) (represented by: Á.M. László, ügyvéd)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Natex International Trade SpA (Pioltello, Italy)
—Amendment of the decision of the defendant and dismissal in its entirety of the application for registration with regard to all goods;
—An order that the defendant bear the costs.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Natex International Trade SpA
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘NATY’S’ for goods in classes 29, 30 and 32 (application for registration No 5 810 627)
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: the figurative mark ‘Naty’ for goods and services in classes 30 and 35 (Community trade mark No 4 149 456)
Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the application
Pleas in law: breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, in that there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).