EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-607/18 P: Appeal brought on 24 September 2018 by NKT Verwaltungs GmbH, formerly nkt cables GmbH, NKT A/S, formerly NKT Holding A/S against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2018 in Case T-447/14: NKT Verwaltungs and NKT v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0607

62018CN0607

September 24, 2018
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

26.11.2018

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/30

(Case C-607/18 P)

(2018/C 427/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: NKT Verwaltungs GmbH, formerly nkt cables GmbH, NKT A/S, formerly NKT Holding A/S (represented by: B. Creve, advocaat, M. Kofmann, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellants claim that the Court should:

set aside the judgment under appeal in whole or in part;

annul the decision at issue (1) in whole or in part;

in the alternative, refer the case back to the General Court for determination in accordance with the judgment of the Court of Justice;

order a measure of organisation; and

order the Commission to pay the costs of both the appeal proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

First plea: The General Court erroneously determined the territorial scope of the infringement.

Second plea: The General Court committed errors in law when assessing the scope of the SCI (2) and the scope of NKT’s participation in and awareness of the SCI.

Third plea: The General Court committed errors in law when holding that the appellants’ rights of defence had not been infringed.

Fourth plea: The General Court committed errors in law when rejecting the appellants’ plea for an annulment or reduction of the fine.

(1) Commission Decision C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

(2) Single and continuous infringement.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia