I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2018/C 427/38)
Language of the case: English
Appellants: NKT Verwaltungs GmbH, formerly nkt cables GmbH, NKT A/S, formerly NKT Holding A/S (represented by: B. Creve, advocaat, M. Kofmann, advokat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
The appellants claim that the Court should:
—set aside the judgment under appeal in whole or in part;
—annul the decision at issue (1) in whole or in part;
—in the alternative, refer the case back to the General Court for determination in accordance with the judgment of the Court of Justice;
—order a measure of organisation; and
—order the Commission to pay the costs of both the appeal proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court.
First plea: The General Court erroneously determined the territorial scope of the infringement.
Second plea: The General Court committed errors in law when assessing the scope of the SCI (2) and the scope of NKT’s participation in and awareness of the SCI.
Third plea: The General Court committed errors in law when holding that the appellants’ rights of defence had not been infringed.
Fourth plea: The General Court committed errors in law when rejecting the appellants’ plea for an annulment or reduction of the fine.
—
(1) Commission Decision C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.
(2) Single and continuous infringement.