EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-378/11 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 September 2011 — Longevity Health Products, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Biofarma SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM — Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed — Decision of the Board of Appeal declaring that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CB0378

62011CB0378

September 21, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

28.1.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/24

(Case C-378/11 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM - Failure to comply with the obligation to pay the appeal fee within the period prescribed - Decision of the Board of Appeal declaring that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed)

(2012/C 25/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Longevity Health Products, Inc. (represented by: J. Korab, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Biofarma SA

Re:

Appeal against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 April 2011 in Case T-95/11 Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Biofarma (VITACHRON MALE) by which that court dismissed an action brought by the applicant for the word mark ‘VITACHRON MALE’ for goods and services in, inter alia, Class 5 against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 10 January 2011 in Case R 1356/2010-4, declaring that the appeal against the Opposition Division’s decision — which refused registration of that mark in the opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the national marks ‘VITATHION’ for goods and services in Class 5 — was deemed not to have been filed since the appeal fee had not been paid within the time-limit.

Operative part of the order

1.The appeal is dismissed.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia