EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-640/20: Order of the General Court of 22 November 2022 — Validity v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a draft call for proposals co-funded by the ERDF — Documents originating from a Member State — Partial refusal of access — Disclosure after the action had been brought — Interest in bringing proceedings ceasing to exist — No need to adjudicate in part — Request to modify the application — Partial inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0640

62020TB0640

November 22, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

30.1.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/61

(Case T-640/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a draft call for proposals co-funded by the ERDF - Documents originating from a Member State - Partial refusal of access - Disclosure after the action had been brought - Interest in bringing proceedings ceasing to exist - No need to adjudicate in part - Request to modify the application - Partial inadmissibility)

(2023/C 35/75)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Validity Foundation — Mental Disability Advocacy Centre (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: B. Van Vooren and R. Oyarzabal Arigita, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Commission Decision C(2020) 5540 final of 6 August 2020, by which the Commission refused it access to documents relating to a draft call for proposals from the Hungarian authorities and, secondly, of Commission Decision C(2021) 2834 final of 19 April 2021 granting it access to those documents.

Operative part of the order

1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 5540 final of 6 August 2020, by which the Commission refused Validity Foundation — Mental Disability Advocacy Centre access to documents relating to a draft call for proposals of the Hungarian authorities.

2.The remainder of the action is dismissed as inadmissible.

3.Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 9, 11.1.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia